Tagged with Sports Movies vs. Real Life

Sports Movies vs. Real Life. Part IV: The Greatest Sports Story Ever Played

Okay. I’m going to start this one with a challenge: read this completely, 100% factually accurate description of what happened in the last two months of the 2011 Major League Baseball season, and tell me you couldn’t (if you really had to) make it into one of the greatest sports films of all time.

While my examples in Parts II and III relied largely on external events, and big picture, “good guy” vs. “bad guy” dynamics (though both were spectacular games in their own right), my final example does not have any such clear distinctions. The compelling part of this narrative is the sport itself. It is the epitome of an underdog story, with unlikely comebacks galore. For my money, the best “sports movie” fodder out there that someone has to make into a film sometime before I die is the improbable story of the 2011 St. Louis Cardinals.

This team’s journey represented the end of several eras. It was the end of both Albert Pujols’ and Tony La Russa’s tenures in St. Louis. It was the end of the Wild Card format as we’ve known it since 1994. None of the above would go gentle into that good night.

The drama actually started before the playoffs, in September. And the Cardinals weren’t alone. But you wouldn’t have been able to tell at the beginning of the month. Simply put, baseball had no pennant races in 2011. The only real drama was whether the Yankees or Red Sox would be crowned champions of the American League East. On September 1st the Red Sox held a half game lead over the arch-rival New York Yankees, who held a commanding 8.5 game lead in the Wild Card race. In the National League, the Atlanta Braves held a similar 8.5 game margin over the St. Louis Cardinals.

And then this funny thing started happening. Toward the middle of September, people in Georgia and New England started talking very anxiously. Their beloved Braves and Sox seemed to have lost the ability to win games. No one could explain it. Especially in Boston’s case. Their roster was just absolutely loaded. Any expert that didn’t have “Phillies vs. Red Sox” as their World Series pick was just trying to be different.

And then they just kept losing.

The tone of the conversation shifted. The Cardinals and Rays were too far back to take advantage, everyone reasoned. The Braves and Red Sox had to win eventually. Honestly, there had never been a collapse like this one in the Wild Card Era. Never. And, as everyone knows, once you get into the playoffs anything can happen.

But the Braves and Red Sox kept losing. And the Cardinals and Rays kept winning.

Toward the end of the month, leads crept further and further down. 4 games. 3 games. 2 games. And then, on September 26th, something truly remarkable happened: the Boston Red Sox dropped into a tie with the Tampa Bay Rays, with matching 89-71 records. The next day, September 27th, the Atlanta Braves matched their ignoble feat by falling into a tie with the St. Louis Cardinals, 89-72 their matching marks. These events were simply without precedent.

Having just moved to the New England area after years of hating Boston-area teams, I will admit to having felt quite a bit of schadenfreude over the collapse of a mighty dynasty with a sickeningly high payroll. But that isn’t why I’m writing this. I’m writing this because of what happened in those days, those weeks. People talked about baseball in September. Everyone talked about baseball. During a time when baseball is generally an afterthought unless your team was in postseason contention, the internet, the radio, television… everyone felt something about what was going on in regular season baseball. Some, like me, were amused. Others were increasingly infuriated and frustrated. But suddenly regular season baseball mattered again.

September 28th, 2011 was the last day of the regular season. At the beginning of the day, the impossible had happened: both Wild Card races, which had been 8.5-game laughers at the beginning of the month, were tied. The Red Sox and Rays were tied at 90 wins and 71 losses; the Braves and Cardinals at 89 and 72.

As that day dawned, anything could happen. The Braves and Red Sox could both “back in” to the playoffs, as they say, their postgame celebrations a muted affair leaving us with more questions than answers. One or both could be forced to play a one-game playoff against a team they had held a seemingly insurmountable lead over at the beginning of the month.

Or the improbable, the impossible, the unthinkable could happen: both teams could be eliminated from postseason contention, setting the stage for two stories that would be shocking even if they happened by themselves.

This was, without any possibility of argument, the most dramatic final day of regular season play in Wild Card Era baseball.

Four games began at roughly the same time. Phillies/Braves, Cardinals/Astros, Red Sox/Orioles, and Yankees/Rays. With both races tied, the outcomes of these games would determine the fate of the Wild Card in both leagues.

The only game of the four that featured almost no drama saw Chris Carpenter shut out the Astros while his offense put 5 runs on the board in the first inning, and never looked back, winning a no-contest 8 to 0.

The Braves’ fate was sealed in a dramatic 13-inning affair against their arch rival Philadelphia, which saw the Braves leading 3-2 going into the 9th inning, only to see a 9th-inning rally tie the game, and a bloop single provide the winning run in the 13th inning. The National League Wild Card winner had been crowned.

But we were far from done.

Far more dramatic were the two decisive American League games. Early on, there was no such drama. The Rays watched with dismay as the Yankees jumped out to a 7 to 0 lead early in the game. The Red Sox had a much slimmer 3 to 2 lead over the Orioles before rain delayed the start of the 7th inning, but they went into the delay confident that their worst case scenario was a one-game playoff the next day. Surely the Rays would not be able to overcome a 7-run deficit.

The Rays loaded the bases in the 8th inning. The Yankees walked in a run, and it was 7-1. Sean Rodriguez was hit by a pitch, and it was 7-2. B.J. Upton hit a sacrifice fly, and it was 7-3. And then, with two outs, Evan Longoria hit his 30th home run of the season and suddenly the impossible was possible. It was a one run game. And Tropicana Field (for once almost full) was going crazy.

That was all for the eighth inning. And, with the Red Sox still rain delayed, the Rays came up in the bottom of the ninth inning. The first two batters were retired without incident. And Cory Wade, closer for the night, had Dan Johnson on the ropes. It wasn’t just the last inning. It wasn’t just the last out. It was the last strike. Johnson hit one of the most dramatic home runs you will ever see, and the Rays had come all the way back.

Play resumed in Boston as extra innings began in Tampa. The Red Sox clung to a 1-run advantage until the ninth inning. They sent one of the best closers in baseball to the mound to seal the deal. But, in a fitting testament to the season as a whole, talent alone was not enough to ensure victory.

After striking out the first two batters, Papelbon gave up a double. And then a ground rule double. The game was tied, and a runner was still in scoring position for Robert Andino.

The count was 1-1. Papelbon threw a 90 mile-an-hour splitter that Andino hit toward left fielder Carl Crawford of all people. Reimold was running on contact. Despite a diving attempt, the highly paid, much maligned outfielder saw the ball pop out of his glove, and he airmailed the throw to home. The Orioles, a team that hasn’t been to the playoffs since Cal Ripken Jr. patrolled shortstop, were celebrating on the field on the last day of the regular season.

Less than three minutes later, with the fans still going crazy because the final score of the Red Sox game had just been posted on the scoreboard, Evan Longoria was at the plate facing Scott Proctor in the 12th inning.

How else could it possibly end? Evan Longoria put it in the seats for his 31st home run of the season, and the Rays were going to the playoffs.

I have never seen, and don’t expect to soon see, a more dramatic last day of regular season play. You can forgive me for assuming that the playoffs were going to be a letdown after the drama that unfolded in late September.

I was wrong. Three of the four Division Series went the distance, and the Philadelphia Phillies and New York Yankees, who had been cemented at Number One and Number Two in the power rankings for most of the season (interrupted by brief visits from Boston) were eliminated in the first round.

The League Championship Series were both 6-game affairs, the National League variety made more interesting by the fact that the Cardinals and Brewers were division rivals, and Albert Pujols and Prince Fielder were facing each other in Cardinals and Brewers uniforms probably for the last time. The real story, though, was the way the postsesaon unofficial rulebook was being rewritten: for decades, starting pitching has determined your success in the postseason. No more. The Cardinals and Rangers would face each other in a World Series in which none of their starting pitchers had recorded a quality start in the League Championship Series.

Though though the Rays’ Cindarella story had ended with a first round exit, the Cardinals found themselves in the World Series for the third time in seven years.

I need to stop here for a moment so we can reflect on this. The Cardinals had been written off before the season even started. They had lost their ace pitcher, Adam Wainwright, to Tommy John Surgery before he threw a single pitch in a regular season game. Albert Pujols’ impending free agency loomed over the entire year. There just seemed to be too many things going wrong for this team.

So the stage was set for the best World Series in my lifetime. Shockingly, despite seeing the impossible happen in so many different phases of the game, despite the eerily similar circumstances under which the underdog Cardinals stole the series from the heavily favored Detroit Tigers in 2006, almost every expert picked the Texas Rangers to win. The Cardinals were written off one more time.

The Cardinals got a strong start from Chris Carpenter in Game 1, and took the game 3-2 behind timely hitting and yet another gem from their bullpen. Low-scoring games in the World Series have a special kind of intensity, one where every play, ever small moment is magnified. This was one of those games.

Continuing the theme of surprisingly strong starting pitching that neither team had demonstrated elsewhere in the playoffs, Jaime Garcia and Colby Lewis held the game scoreless through six innings. It took a dramatic 2-run ninth inning and a save from Neftali Feliz for the Rangers to take a Game 2 that was almost a mirror image of Game 1.

Albert Pujols absorbed a great deal of criticism for leaving the stadium without addressing the media after Game 2. He responded with the greatest individual performance in World Series history in Game 3. Albert was 5-6, tying Paul Molitor’s record for hits in a World Series game, Babe Ruth and Reggie Jackson’s record three home runs in a World Series game, Hideki Matsui and Bobby Richardson’s record of 6 RBIs in a World Series game, and setting a new record with 14 total bases in a World Series game. Unsurprisingly behind such an unparalleled performance, the Cardinals won in a rout, 16-7.

Game 4 saw a shocking gem from Rangers’ starter Derek Holland, who pitched 8 1/3 innings of two-hit baseball, and the Rangers took the contest 4-0.

Game 5 was another close contest, this time featuring an uncharacteristic Cardinals meltdown when closer Jason Motte was unavailable to pitch in the decisive 8th inning, when the Rangers took (and would hold) a 4-2 lead.

One more time, the Cardinals were written off. People started talking about which Ranger should be the MVP of the Series (Mike Napoli seemed to be the popular pick). The Rangers seemed to give ample reason for this when Adrian Beltre and Nelson Cruz hit back-to-back homers and Ian Kinsler added an RBI single in the top of the 7th inning to break a 4-4 tie and give the Rangers a 7-4 lead.

In the bottom of the 9th inning, the lead was still 7-5, and closer Neftali Perez came in to end the Cardinals’ cindarella series. He got Ryan Theriot swinging but gave up a double to Pujols and walked Lance Berkman. He recovered to strike Allen Craig looking, and suddenly the Cardinals were down to their last out.

Up to the plate stepped the unlikely NLCS MVP. On a team with the likes of Albert Pujols, Lance Berkman, and Matt Holliday, the big hero of the postseason thus far had been David Freese. And they needed him to be it again with the season on the line.

That wasn’t dramatic enough.

Perez worked the count to 1-2, and suddenly the Cardinals were down not only to their last out, but their last strike. Remember with me, if you will, another team that faced this same situation. Season on the line. One pitch away from losing it all.

David Freese didn’t put it in the seats, but he did hit a triple to right field, scoring Albert Pujols and Lance Berkman and tying the game at 7-all.

The Cardinals’ joy would seemingly be short lived. In the top of the 10th, Josh Hamilton hit a two-run homer, his first of the series, and just like that the Cardinals were staring elimination in the face yet again.

The Cardinals scored one run on Ryan Theriot’s groundout, but that run came at the cost of once again bringing them to the brink. Berkman came to the plate with two outs, and with a 2-2 count, the Cardinals were once again down to their last strike.

But by now you know the Rangers never got it. Berkman rifled a line drive to center field, and the Cardinals scored to tie the game.

One inning later, in the bottom of the 11th, the first batter of the inning was none other than David Freese, who two innings ago had saved the Cardinals from elimination. He took a full-count pitch to center field, and the most stunning World Series comeback I’ve ever seen was complete.

Now, you can be forgiven for pointing out that Game 7 was pretty forgettable, comparatively. But after the two largest regular season collapses ever, the 2011 World Series gave us what many are calling the greatest single-game performance by any player in World Series history (Game 3) and what many are calling the greatest comeback in World Series history, and what some are calling the greatest game in World Series history, or even baseball history (Game 6). Yeah, Game 7 would be part of the ending montage (Like the Gold Medal game in Miracle?), but that hardly matters at this point.

The biggest problem with turning this into a movie is that it’s more unbelievable than any sports movie I’ve ever seen. Game 6 alone strains credulity to the point that anyone who wasn’t watching or listening to the game would find it impossible to believe that it was actually that dramatic.

We started with the popular notion that sports movies are “more dramatic” than real sports. While that is often true, and while sports movies might run the risk of diluting these incredibly rare occasions, this was at least one occasion when real life sports was far more dramatic than its film counterparts.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sports Movies vs. Real Life. Part III: Sequels Raise the Stakes

In Part I, I discussed the basic format of sports films (and elements of what can be considered a “great” sports film), and several examples of this. I noted that the biggest objection to sports films, even ones universally acclaimed, is their lack of realism. In Part II, I gave one example of an actual sporting event that sounded an awful lot like something Hollywood might cook up.

That totally could’ve been a fluke, though, right? Well, I’m actually beginning to think the NFL has a clause in their Collective Bargaining Agreement that requires any crippling scandal to be negated by a feel-good upset in the playoffs.

This next game was one of those rare occasions in sports when we thought we knew the story, and then it changed after the fact. On January 14, 2012, we witnessed a pretty good upset with big, late plays that would fit adequately well in a sports movie as long as there was a larger storyline for it to fit into. On March 2, 2012, we got that storyline.

That day, the news broke that the NFL had evidence that the New Orleans Saints defensive players and coaches had participated in a bounty system, with the full knowledge of Head Coach Payton and General Manager Loomis. Defensive Coordinator Williams and somewhere between 22 and 27 players had maintained a pool of money to be paid to defensive players who deliberately injured targeted opposing players, including quarterbacks Brett Favre, Kurt Warner, and Alex Smith.

I’m not going to spend too much time talking about the scandal specifically, but I will say this: there is no question in my mind that if the Saints were a college team rather than a professional team, they would’ve been required to vacate their Super Bowl XLIV title. In the NCAA, it would be enough that they had participated in this heinous practice during their Super Bowl season. What should put it over the top, even in the NFL, is that they were probably in that Super Bowl because of this practice.

Everyone remembers how the 2009-10 NFC Championship ended: with Brett Favre throwing a baffling interception to end the game. Now, I’m not a Brett Favre fan (quite the opposite), and that was hardly the first time Brett Favre had made a mental error like that, but let’s examine some of the factors that might’ve led to that particular interception.

During and after the game, much was made of the fact that Brett Favre could barely walk because of the punishing hits he had received from the New Orleans Saints defenders. Yes, football is a violent sport, but remember: Brett Favre was specifically named as one of the players the Saints had a bounty on, and if those hits were a result of players deliberately trying to injure him, it changes everything.

Running the football was clearly a better option in that situation, as Favre would’ve had the opening to run to well within field goal range to win the game. But Favre’s mobility was clearly severely impaired. Not only that, when you realize the defenders are hitting you much harder than usual, suppose you even have an inkling that they’re deliberately trying to hurt you… do you want to take another hit, or do you want to get rid of the football?

Up until Bountygate, Spygate was the worst sports scandal of my lifetime. It was worse than performance-enhancing drugs, because it jeopardized the competitive integrity of the entire sport, and may have swung no less than three Super Bowls. If it weren’t for the Patriots’ unfair advantage, who’s to say that the Indianapolis Colts aren’t the team of the decade in the 2000s instead of the Patriots? I don’t think anyone can, especially since the sort of cheating Belichick was doing works best against teams you play often.

Bountygate was worse. True, it wasn’t actually cheating. But words are insufficient to adequately express my disgust with what the Saints did. They attempted to deliberately endanger the health and well being of other human beings in order to win football games. Let me repeat that: to win football games. Don’t tell me football is a violent sport. I know that. But there’s a difference between a violent sport and deliberately attempting to injure someone. I’ve actually been extremely disappointed with how some sports journalists I otherwise respect are reacting to this.

The most chilling piece of evidence that’s come out is an audio recording of Defensive Coordinator Williams’ locker room speech prior to the NFC Playoff game between the New Orleans Saints and the San Francisco 49ers. In this recording, Williams is heard giving specific instructions as to which 49ers players to injure, and how to injure them. He instructs his players to concuss quarterback Alex Smith, running back Frank Gore, and kick returner Kyle Williams, to tear receiver Michael Crabtree’s ACL, and to injure tight end Vernon Davis’s ankles.

Well, they didn’t succeed. And the course of the game would provide a stirring rebuke.

If I’m making a film about this? It starts with a montage about the Saints and 49ers’ respective regular seasons. In between montages of game footage and journalists’ reactions (with a heavy emphasis on Alex Smith’s drastic improvement and Drew Brees’ chase for Dan Marino’s record) you have footage of your actors interacting. You show Harbaugh’s relationship with Smith, patting him on the back and congratulating him on the year he’s having. You undercut the stories about Brees’ record chase with quiet, suspicious conversations between General Manager Loomis and Head Coach Payton.

Your pregame buildup? Williams’ speech, obviously. And you show Head Coach Payton in the background, seeing it happen and doing nothing about it.

The game started out in shocking fashion. The 49ers stunned the Saints by jumping out to a huge early lead thanks to a lot of turnovers. However, fairly early in the game the tone shifted dramatically. The Saints defense was able to shut down the 49ers offense, and there was a clear momentum shift even before the Saints started to catch up.

Use that. That’s great material for a sudden tonal shift. Emphasize every big hit, show Williams’ reactions (definitely play those up). Maybe show some of his players being a little uncomfortable when he pats them on the back if evidence ever comes out that not every player bought into this. You see how this practically writes itself?

With the 49ers desperately clinging to their advantage with the offense playing inconsistently at best, the Saints finally took the lead in the 4th quarter on a Drew Brees touchdown pass, making the score 24-23. With 4 minutes left to play Alex Smith, the quarterback who everyone had so little faith in, needed to win the game for the 49ers. Their offense had been so ineffective all game that it felt like they suddenly had an impossible mountain to climb.

Instead, Smith threw a 37-yard bomb to Vernon Davis to put his team at the 28-yard line. And then, Smith took the ball himself on a designed quarterback run for a 28-yard touchdown. The crowd went absolutely nuts.

Their jubilation was short-lived, however, as Drew Brees threw a 66-yard touchdown and two-point conversion to give the Saints a 32-29 lead with 1:37 to play. Everyone sighed in disappointment. There was absolutely no way that Alex Smith was going to be able to engineer a comeback drive twice in a game like this.

And then he did.

After two quick completions, Smith threw a 47-yard bomb to (who else?) Vernon Davis, and the 49ers had the ball in the red zone. One more completion moved them up to the 14-yard-line, where Smith spiked the ball to stop the clock with 14 seconds left.

I’ll just let the 49ers radio announcers tell you what happened next.

“Smith in the [shot]gun with Gore on his left hip. Third down, Alex takes the snap, Alex looking–” “He’s got him!!” “–on the post!! And it’s–!!” “HE’S GOT IT!!!!” “CAUGHT!!! TOUCHDOWN!!!! TOUCHDOWN, 49ERS!!!!!!!!! Vernon Davis with the PLAY OF HIS LIFE! Alex Smith with the PLAY OF HIS LIFE!!! And the 49ers are 9 seconds away from playing for the NFC Championship!”

Okay, wow. Even without the context provided by later revelations, I just couldn’t turn that broadcast off while the 49ers and their fans celebrated their huge win. I felt suffused with a sort of warmth that only other huge sports fans can really entirely relate to. With the larger context? Forget it. This is one of my Top 5 sports moments ever, and it didn’t involve any Chicago teams. Just unbelievable.

And you want to know the best part? Not only was that not the best sports-movie-like moment I’ve ever seen, it wasn’t even the best sports-movie-like moment of 2012. I saved the best for last.

Concluded in Part IV.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Sports Movies vs. Real Life. Part II: Life Imitates Art

It should be clear from Part I that I find “underdog” sports films much more successful when the sport itself provides the basis for determining who the “good guys” and “bad guys” are. Several of these are examples of the “ripped from the headlines” phenomenon, but what’s truly remarkable is that sports themselves have provided us with several recent examples of this phenomenon in reverse. That is, sporting events that take on the shape of a sports film, such that it’s almost difficult to believe you’re watching them in real life.

In the next three parts of the series, I will relate three of these events that happened during my lifetime. In fact, each happened within the past four years. Each of these events not only provides obvious fodder for future sports films, but blows huge holes in the argument that sports films are much more dramatic than real life.

The first example I ever saw of this phenomenon was Super Bowl XLII, played on February 3, 2008 between the New York Giants and the New England Patriots. New England had been caught cheating in their very first game of the season in a scandal that came to be known as “Spygate.” Simply put, they had been videotaping their opponents’ defensive signals in order to determine what play the defense was running. It would later be revealed that the illegal activity dated back to 2000. New England was instantaneously transformed into one of the most hated teams in professional sports.

New England responded by setting a slew of offensive records and developing a reputation for a punishing defense en route to the first 16-0 regular season in NFL history. When they tore through the AFC Playoffs to arrive in Glendale, Arizona as a heavy Super Bowl favorite, it appeared that they simply could not be stopped.

If someone was going to stop them, it certainly wasn’t going to be the New York Giants. They made it to the playoffs as a Wild Card on the strength of an unremarkable 10-6 record. Everyone agreed they just weren’t going to be a factor in the postseason. Eli Manning was too mistake-prone. They weren’t disciplined. They hated their coach, who probably would’ve been fired if they hadn’t made the playoffs. They just clearly weren’t on the same level, as they proved in their final regular season game on December 29, 2007, a loss to (who else?) the New England Patriots.

Happy New Year.

No one really noticed their win over the weak Tampa Bay Buccaneers in the first round. When they beat the heavily favored Dallas Cowboys, people did start talking… about what went wrong for Dallas.

Their thrilling overtime victory in the NFC Championship again initially drew more reactions about Brett Favre’s interception than it did accolades for the Giants. Slowly but surely, however, people started to realize that the Giants were playing incredibly good football, and even started to ask forbidden questions, like whether Eli Manning has arrived as a true franchise quarterback.

Too bad there was no way they could win.

So Super Bowl XLII was the perfect setup. The underdogs against the football gods. The “good guys” and “bad guys” completely superseding the traditional Boston/New York rivalry, relying on a much simpler distinction: the difference between cheaters and non-cheaters.

If you weren’t happy about the result of this game, you probably live in Boston. And from a pure football standpoint, three lead changes in the fourth quarter (a Super Bowl record) made this a very exciting game. But as previously mentioned, this was no mere football game. This was, quite possibly and without overstatement, the most important Super Bowl ever played.

After a bruising defensive struggle over the first three quarters, the Patriots marched down the field and scored with two minutes and forty-two seconds showing on the clock. Everyone who was just warming to the idea of the Patriots finally being taken down collectively exclaimed, “Oh gosh, not again.”

Then the New York Giants threw the Patriots’ own game right back in their faces, making Eli Manning look Joe Montana-esque.

So many things that are good and pure in sports happened that night. And to have them in such stark contrast to the cynical, cold, calculating Patriots was even sweeter. It was everything a Super Bowl is supposed to be. The bad guys were heavily favored to win. The bad guys had a lead with less than a minute to play. The good guys had one last chance to take the lead in the game, and it took at least one miracle play to get into a position to do that (the Helmet Catch.) That’s how we ended up with 1st and 10 at the Patriots’ 14 yard line.

Eli Manning drops back; New England brings an all-out blitz. Eli, the little brother who can’t do anything right, who won’t ever be good enough no matter what he does, lobs a pass that falls right into an uncovered Plexico Burress’s lap. You will never see an easier touchdown in professional football. But you will never see a more important touchdown in professional football. And the crowd went absolutely nuts.

Why was this so important? Because it restored my faith; it restored our faith. Good things, unexpected things, can still happen in sports. There is somewhere in this world where it’s still okay to believe in magic. When Burress caught that pass, the entire stadium shook from the fans’ collective joy. If there were any Patriots fans in that stadium (in fact, there were likely plenty), the Giants fans more than made up for their silence. You will never hear a louder crowd.

The moment that will be burned in my mind forever is Eli Manning’s reaction. It’s a perfect allegory for how his career has gone. At first, when one of his offensive linemen almost tackled him in joy (you know he had to be telling him, “You just won the Super Bowl!”), he looked completely overwhelmed and almost in disbelief. Then as he realized what had just happened, he was not overcome by the moment. He suddenly looked completely different. He strode towards his own sideline with a confidence and a swagger that can only come from a true champion. He wasn’t intimidated by the New England Patriots. He looked like a man who wouldn’t have been fazed if the 1984 49ers or 1972 Dolphins had shown up in their place.

And what does the camera cut to next? The Patriots sideline, with Tom Brady warming up for what we all knew with delicious, vengeful satisfaction was going to be a futile attempt at an answering scoring drive.

So when we hear story after story about cheating–-Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Bill Belichick-–we will have one, beautiful moment, with one, beautiful story. Any time we feel bad about the state of sports, any time we feel cynical, any time we question whether we should even bother caring who wins and loses, who cheats and who’s clean we can look back at this game and think to ourselves, “Somebody beat those bastards. They didn’t get away with it.”

It happened. Nothing can change it, nothing can take it away.

And it would make one hell of a sports movie. It pretty much writes itself. The struggling Giants face the unbeaten Patriots in the final game of the regular season, and watch the Patriots celebrate their 16-0 finish on their own field. You see their disappointment about missing the opportunity to knock them off, and the coach says, “Hey. Let’s get them in the Super Bowl.” You gloss over the Tampa Bay game (Because, really: who cares?). You focus on the Cowboys/Giants rivalry in the second playoff game but mostly gloss over it. You focus on the harsh conditions, Favre’s interception, and the Giants’ jubiliation at the game-winning field goal in the NFC Championship. (Wow, the Giants’ road through the playoffs really took us on a tour of some of the most hated figures in professional sports.) Make the contrast between the Patriots and Giants pretty obvious in the lead-up to the Super Bowl. Remember the way everyone in the media kind of smirked and looked at each other funny when the Giants brashly declared they were going to beat the Patriots? Use that. Show a few aside conversations where different reporters talk about how they’re going to get killed. Then the Super Bowl basically writes itself. Done deal.

I mean, sure: it’s way too dramatic, it never actually happens that way–oh, wait.

Continued in Part III.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sports Movies vs. Real Life. Part I: Art Imitates Life

There is an understandable amount of popular cynicism regarding sports films. “It never happens that way,” people will complain. They’ll laugh aloud at the improbability of the situation, the events that transpire, and–of course–the ending. It’s understandable why a fan of actual sports would find an archetypal sports film simultaneously entertaining and deeply flawed. There is a tension between the need to suspend disbelief and the fact that sports films are based on a perceived source of “real life” drama.

The vast majority of non-comedic sports films follow one of two formulas (which are essentially related): the unlikely, “underdog” team achieving an upset that was thought to be impossible, or the aging hero making an improbable comeback feel-good story. I am going to focus on the former. The essential elements of this story are familiar. The most important perceived difference between these films and actual sporting events is that the distinction between the “good guys” and “bad guys” is clear to everyone, rather than an arbitrary distinction based entirely on an accident of geography. The “underdog” team generally includes one player (or multiple players) who “can’t do anything right,” but undergoes a transformative experience and becomes a key figure in the team’s eventual victory. This victory, of course, comes on a last-second goal, shot, home run, touchdown, etc, or at least has some sort of dramatic, “signature ending.”

A recent phenomenon in sports movies has been “ripped from the headlines” films that depict historical events that already fulfill (or at least seem to fulfill) all or most of these criteria. One problematic example of this is the 2004 film Miracle. On the surface level, it fulfills all of the essential elements of the archetypal underdog sports film. Team USA fails to come together as a team for most of the film’s first act, culminating in a disappointing tie with the Norwegian National Team in an exhibition. Coach Brooks is livid, and forces his players to skate drills until they are beyond exhausted even after the stadium’s lights have been turned out. One of the consistent motifs of this first act has been Coach Brooks asking his players their names and who they play for, and each player has responded with the college they’ve just graduated from. After these grueling drills, Mike Eruzione finally delivers the desired response of, “I play for the United States of America.” With that, the drills are ended, and the team’s unity is dramatically established.

The film progresses in fairly predictable fashion, until of course we have the dramatic showdown between the Soviet hockey team and Team USA. With little dramatic embellishment, this game is an almost frame-by-frame replication of the actual February 22, 1980 Medal Round contest between these teams. Though there isn’t a last-second goal or save, the game does have its signature ending, with Al Michaels’ famous call, “Do you believe in miracles? Yes!” as the clock reached zero.

Of course, this leaves one last element, and the one the film relied most heavily upon for the majority of its drama: the “good guys”/”bad guys” dynamic. This actually would’ve been entirely achievable using elements related only to the game itself. The Soviet team had an unparalleled recent history of dominance of the sport (this was mentioned briefly), and their status as “amateur” players was, frankly, justifiably questioned (this was not.) Of course, this was not the narrative the film decided to focus on; instead, they relied on a fairly lazy reading of the frequently cited nationalist implications of the game. In essence, they reinforced the destructive Cold War mentality by depicting the Soviet team as the bad guys because… well… they were Russians! Although that was clearly the prevailing notion at the time, the film does nothing to problematize this, and in fact frequently reinforces it.

Now, make no mistake: I enjoyed this film a great deal. And, still largely caught up in the wave of post-9/11 patriotism, I ate up the nationalistic narrative that was spoon fed to me at the time. (Whereas now, I must enjoy the film in spite of that, not because of it.) It was based on a truly remarkable sports story… unfortunately, it chose not to depict it as a sports story so much as a really unnecessary 13-years-later Cold War end zone dance.

Other “ripped from the headlines” sports films have relied on similar clashes to create their drama, but have oftentimes had “bigger picture” social messages, unlike Miracle which, while entertaining in its own right, is at its core essentially a two hour-long love letter to he United States. Glory Road depicts depicts Coach Haskins and Texas Western College, the first team in NCAA history to start five black players in the NCAA Tournament, violating the “unwritten rule” that you could only play one, or in extreme cases two, black players at a time. The film has its defining dramatic moment (the closely contested championship game against Kentucky), its natural hero/villain dynamic (Kentucky and Coach Rupp, and the racist ideology they represent, which Texas Western struggles against throughout the entire film.)

Oscar-nominated Moneyball takes a different tack by making the game itself the centerpiece of the film’s drama. It brings to the big screen the frustration of small-market teams trying to compete with teams like the Red Sox and (of course) the Yankees. This frustration serves as a spectacular source of “underdog” tension, as well as giving the film a “big picture” message that relies only on the sport itself.

Unfortunately, this film is also trying to cram the narrative it wants to tell into actual historical events, and the Oakland Athletics never won the World Series under Billy Beane. In fact, what the film doesn’t show is that the Athletics once again lose in the first round of the playoffs. So the film must instead focus on Oakland’s success in the regular season. This is why, although I thoroughly enjoyed the film and its overarching message, I am not entirely comfortable with it as a sports film. The Athletics’ win streak was a remarkable feat, but it wasn’t an especially satisfying emotional climax to a sports film, especially in light of how most baseball fans view regular season baseball. No fan grows up dreaming of winning 20 regular season games in a row. I won’t argue that it didn’t matter (it certainly did), I’m just not sure it mattered enough to be the climax of a great sports film.

A League of Their Own takes a different approach than these films by loosely basing its story on the real All-American Girls Baseball League, which played during World War II. This might actually be the best approach: taking something that actually happened, but making the conscious decision to make a completely fictionalized version of it rather than trying to balance the narrative you want to construct with depicting the actual events.

What made A League of Their Own such a successful film is that not only did it have a great social message about gender equality, it was a spectacular baseball movie. It was really clear that the writers and director really “got” baseball, and allowed it to shine as much as any other aspect of the film. One particularly striking moment was during a tirade by Tom Hanks. Although the film is perhaps best known for Hanks’ outrageous declaration, “There’s no crying in baseball!” the film’s signature moment actually comes later in the film, when the main character is planning on leaving the team. She confesses that it “got too hard.” Hanks retorts, “It’s supposed to be hard. If it wasn’t hard, everyone would do it. The hard… is what makes it great.”

Another example of this formula, minus the social message, is Hoosiers. Hoosiers follows the same “loosely based on a true story” formula, and is widely considered the prototypical underdog sports film. Coach Norman Dale (Gene Hackman) takes over a team that seems ill-equipped for success. In this film, the “player who can’t do anything right” is actually provided by both a player and a coach. The former is Ollie, a tiny player no one expects anything from.  The latter is Shooter, a player’s father who is struggling with alcoholism, whom Dale sees the potential to be an excellent coach if he can be reformed. Of course, the team shocks everyone by winning the state championship.

Other, completely fictionalized accounts have also used the game itself as the principal source of drama. Although I will not attempt a remotely exhaustive list, one great example is Major League. Major League is a baseball comedy that, like A League of Their Own, really “gets” the game of baseball, and makes the story of the improbable underdog Cleveland Indians’ race to the playoffs its centerpiece. Although it is a great comedy film, it is also a spectacular baseball film. The New York Yankees become the obvious villains due to their superior payroll and top dog status, and the film just leaves it at that.

Between A League of Their Own, Hoosiers, Major League and (to a lesser extent) Moneyball, it looks like we really have something: sports films can shine by making the sport itself the star of the film. The reasons for this should be obvious: people like watching sports because they are a natural source of drama. This also explains why, even when a sports film is spectacularly successful and beloved by fans of the sport it’s depicting, the most common complaint about it is still, “Well, of course it happened that way. It’s a movie. It never happens like that in real life.”

Doesn’t it, though?

Continued in Part II.

Tagged , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers