Tagged with San Antonio Spurs

“… a disservice to the league and our fans.”

“I have concluded that the Spurs did a disservice to the league and our fans.”

That was David Stern, Commissioner of the National Basketball Association, explaining his decision to fine the San Antonio Spurs $250,000 due to Head Coach Gregg Popovich’s decision to send his three best players and one key role player home prior to the San Antonio Spurs’ game against the defending champion Miami Heat. A decision which makes perfect sense, in light of the fact that the league is supposed to govern what basketball decisions a team makes and there is a clear rule in place to explain what violation the San Antonio Spurs committed which they would have been aware of well in advance of Coach Popovich’s decision.

Wait, I’m sorry, I’m being told that isn’t what happened at all. Apparently NBA teams are supposed to be mostly autonomous and there’s absolutely no precedent for Stern’s decision. Furthermore, absolutely no rules were violated.

What’s truly hialrious about this entire ridiculous situation is that Stern announced the Spurs would face “substantial sanctions” before the game even started. Anyone who has been following any sport for any length of time could probably guess exactly what happened next. The Spurs nearly blew the Miami Heat out of their own building. The defending champions needed a clutch three-pointer by Ray Allen to take the lead with 22 seconds remaining, and free throws on their next possession to secure the 105-100 win.

So, let’s review. The Spurs are being fined for (and I cannot overstate this) breaking no existing rule in order to do what they determined was best for their team. Okay. So, Stern’s justification is that they failed to inform their opponents, the league, and the media (and make no mistake: that last one is the one he really cares about) of this decision. Obviously as a result, the fans were cheated out of a very entertaining game, and the league’s revenue suffered seriously due to the–

No, wait, sorry. Wrong again. The game was really damn entertaining, and so many people who were watching it Tweeted like crazy about it and spurred (no pun intended) other people into watching it that it might end up being one of the highest rated regular season games this year!

Ultimately, I am forced to agree with Commissioner Stern. A serious disservice was done to the league and its fans. But it was not done by Gregg Popovich, Head Coach of the San Antonio Spurs. It was done by David Stern, Commissioner of the National Basketball Association.

Tagged , , ,

Bill Simmons explains the unexplainable

Perhaps it is fitting considering the popular opinion (which Simmons and I both disagree with loudly) that the Spurs are a “boring” team that wins a lot of games: this is not one of Bill Simmons’ greatest playoff game diaries, but it has some excellent moments and manages to articulate some things about this San Antonio Spurs team that are otherwise difficult to articulate. My favorite example from that article:

Here’s the thing: When you can get quality shots pretty much whenever you want, nothing else really matters. The Spurs, as presently constructed and in their present state of health, are unbeatable. In 10 playoff games, they’re averaging 104.1 points, making 49.4 percent of their shots, hitting 41 percent of their 3s and getting assists on 65 percent of their made baskets. They can survive a lousy offensive game from Parker (happened in Game 1), Ginobili or Duncan (happened in Game 2) without being affected in any way, as long as two of them aren’t struggling at once. They can play smallball; they can handle bigger teams; they can play fast or slow. They can handle absolutely anything.

They’ve won their 10 playoff games by an average of 12.5 points, a potentially historic pace; of the best teams ever, only the 1971 Bucks (+14.5) and 2011 Lakers (+12.8) topped that number, with famous juggernauts like the ’86 Celts (+10.6), ’96 Bulls (+10.6), ’87 Lakers (+11.4), ’83 Sixers (+5.9), ’91 Bulls (+11.7) and ’72 Lakers (+3.3) falling short of that mark. They’ve also won an astonishing 20 straight games dating back to the regular season; only three other teams have EVER won more than that (all regular-season streaks, too), and if they sweep Oklahoma City, that 22-game streak will tie the ’08 Rockets for the second-longest streak ever (even if the NBA won’t officially recognize it). Oh, and they’re only six wins away from being the first NBA team to sweep the NBA playoffs. Let’s be honest: This is insane.

He also tackles the idea that the Spurs are “boring”:

I gotta be honest … I don’t understand how anyone could say the Spurs are boring when they have two guards who (a) play beautifully together, (b) get better when it matters, and (c) consistently make some of the most incredibly unique baskets in the league. Three times per Spurs game, either Manu or Parker invents a shot or a drive that makes you say, “Wait, have I ever seen that before?” That’s boring?

(Just for fun, after you read his game diary, if you want to compare it to my live-tweeting of the  game, you might see that we noticed a few similar things, though he obviously expands on them quite a bit more.)

Tagged , , , , , ,

Possible 2012 NBA Finals Matchups

On one of my old blogs, I had a tradition of breaking down the four possible Super Bowl matchups prior to the Conference Championship games. At a reader’s suggestion, I started doing the same for other sports. With the Conference Finals underway in the NBA, it’s time for the inaugural edition of this tradition on this blog!

1) Spurs vs. Celtics
Where Doing It Right Happens
It usually means something when the vast majority of casual fans want one series (hint: not this one), and People Who Know Things want a different one (hint: it’s this one.) Would a Thunder/Heat Finals put three of the best five players on the planet on the floor together? Yep. Would it be a ratings orgy? Definitely. Would it be the best basketball series available?

Nope. Not even close.

The Spurs are a very special basketball team. If you’re confused as to why I think that, Bill Simmons actually does a superb job of explaining it in the last section of this article. A Spurs/Celtics Finals would match up two teams that do things “the right way,” with an emphasis on the team, not on individual talent. Remember: the Celtics were a “Big 3″ super team before the Heat. But they acquired their super team through a pair of shrewd trades, without a self-created media circus. Their identity as a team? Ubuntu, the philosophy Doc Rivers has stressed since day one.

Sometimes there are complicated storylines leading up to the NBA Finals. Sometimes they’re simple. This one is in the latter category: these are just the two teams that deserve to be here.

2) Spurs vs. Heat
Where Obvious Contrasts Happen
I like to imagine a stunned silence has fallen over the audience at this point, much like when a pitcher has a no-hitter going and no one wants to say anything about it outloud. But you’re all thinking it. “She isn’t going to have it last, is she?” Without specifically mentioning what “it” is (preserving the no-hitter metaphor), I will spoil the ending and say no, I won’t. But unlike everyone else in America (aside from veteran basketball journalists and well-educated fans), I find either possibility involving the San Antonio Spurs much, much, much more interesting than any combination involving the Oklahoma City Thunder. Sorry.

Whereas San Antonio/Boston would be a matchup of the two teams that deserve to be there, San Antonio/Miami would be interesting because it would be a stark contrast between a team that deserves to be there and a team that doesn’t. On the one hand, you have a dynasty that built itself from the ground up and features excellent team defense, nearly flawless fundamentals, and without possibility of argument the best coach in the NBA. (There are maybe three coaches in the entire NBA who aren’t mostly interchangeable with any other halfway decent coach in the league. Gregg Popovich is one of them.) On the other hand, you have a team that walks around like it’s a dynasty even though it’s accomplished absolutely nothing and which assembled itself amid self-generated drama that belongs on reality television more than it belongs in sports. And you’d have an essential ingredient to a great NBA Finals: a natural hero and a natural villain.

Oh, yeah, and there’s the minor detail that these are definitely the two best teams left in the playoffs. So call me crazy, but this interests me more than the matchup everyone else wants to see. Speaking of which…

3) Thunder vs. Heat
Where Ratings Orgy Happens
“LeBron James! Kevin Durant! It’s the NBA Finals on ABC!” Yeah, okay, that’s really not remotely hard to promote, is it? It just doesn’t feel that interesting to me, for all the reasons I’ve already explained in the previous two entries.

4) Thunder vs. Celtics
Where Kendrick Perkins Happens
The obligatory “everyone else around me thinks this would be way more interesting than I do” series. (Admittedly, the previous series almost falls into this cateogry, too.) In this particular case, the disparity is because I live within Boston’s sphere of influence, everyone I know cares about Kendrick Perkins way more than I do. Due to the dearth of other storylines, be prepared to find out how many times per game the announcers can find an excuse to mention Perkins/Robinson-for-Green/Krstic/pick.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Broomtown

When the San Antonio Spurs came out of a first quarter full timeout and scored nine unanswered points in three minutes to force an answering Los Angeles full timeout, I came to the conclusion that this game–and the Vinny Del Negro-Gregg Popovich coaching matchup–was not going to, as they say in boxing, go to the cards.

Admittedly, the game ended up being significantly closer than  I anticipated it being (San Antonio won 102-99), but the series did not. The Spurs are doing something special right now, and the league isn’t doing much to slow them down. Their opponents are now 0-for the playoffs, and if you count regular season 0-for their last 18. The Spurs’ sweep of Utah in the first round was their first playoff sweep since the 2007 NBA Finals (over LeBron James’ Cleveland Cavaliers), and they’re playing beyond inspired basketball right now.

Oklahoma City/Miami might be the sexy matchup, but I’m really all in for San Antonio/Boston at this point.  I’ll also take San Antonio/Miami as long as San Antonio frustrates LeBron by once again proving that a team must be greater than the sum of its parts, and that disciplined, high-effort, fundamentally sound defense absolutely can shut down any superstar. But the idea of San Antonio and Boston’s defenses matching up (especially Duncan vs. Garnett) is just mouthwatering. Plus, it would be a pretty stirring rebuke to Miami’s attempt to build a powerhouse overnight by assembling the most toys. Two teams that are supposed to be “too old,” who owe their success largely to familiarity, continuity, disciplined defense, and getting maximum effort every night? Go ahead and call that “boring.” All you’re doing is proving that you aren’t a basketball fan.

The popular consensus is and always has been and always will be that San Antonio isn’t a very sexy team. Call me crazy, but I find winning pretty sexy.

Tagged , , , , ,

Removing the Asterisk

The thing about basketball is that we already know who the great teams are about halfway through the regular season. The playoffs don’t even really provide much of a surprise. They’re incurably long, often feature two teams on an obvious collision course, and are just shockingly predictable.

Except when they’re not.

This year, the big story was supposed to be the huge rematch between the Miami Heat and the Chicago Bulls. This story started before we were even entirely sure there was going to be an NBA season. When the Lockout ended, fans quickly flocked back to the sport because of the unparalleled amount of talent on display. Not since the mid-to-late 1990s has the NBA had this kind of concentration of talent, but there was no more compelling available storyline than Derrick Rose vs. LeBron James. And make no mistake: that’s what a rematch between these two teams would be about.

On the one hand, you have arguably the most gifted athlete to ever play the game, but someone who seems to lack the motivation to reach the level of play everyone knows he is capable of. As the icing on the cake, he turned his back on his home town to chase a title in Miami. On the other hand, you have one of the most physically gifted point guards in the NBA, but someone who for the first few years of his career seemed “too nice” to develop that killer instinct you need to be in the top five. But when LeBron James, Dwayne Wade, and Chris Bosh pulled their stunt in Miami, something remarkable happened: he got angry. And suddenly you have not only a maximum effort player, you have the reigning MVP and one of the deadliest players in the league. Someone who is getting everything he possibly can out of his talents, someone who is fueled with an inner fire the likes of which we’ve rarely seen.

And oh yeah, by the way: playing and winning for his home town is just fine for him, thank you very much.

The waters grew murky during the NBA Lockout of 2011. But it was the way the lockout was resolved that would bring a halt to this collision course. Amid the huge wave of relief from fans and professional observers that we were going to have basketball after all, only a few voices raised in protest for the players’ safety because of the condensed schedule. Although they were drowned out in the “basketball is back!” wave of euphoria, they would promise with chilling significance that injuries were going to happen.

Derrick Rose’s injury problems started during the regular season. Toe, back, groin. He kept trying to get back on the court, and stay on the court. All of these were pretty flukey injuries (as most injuries are in the NBA). But then, the unthinkable happened. In the first game of the playoffs, with the Bulls nursing a late lead, Derrick Rose went up for a jump shot… and came down in a crumpled heap with what would later be revealed to be a torn ACL. And the Bulls’ season never got back up with him.

Immediately, the title was handed to the Miami Heat. Fans, journalists, bloggers… hell, I even handed it to them. Bill Simmons was one of the most prominent sportswriters to advance the popular notion that this would be an “asterisk” NBA title, like the Rockets winning during Jordan’s first retirement. Wow, this seems to keep involving Chicago, doesn’t it? But the point is, Miami was going to win their first title since assembling their super team, and they were going to do it because their main competitor was crippled by the biggest in a series of injuries due to the NBA’s recklessness.

Chris Bosh’s injury (forcing LeBron James to play power forward) may change the narrative by allowing Indiana to complete the upset in the series which is currently tied at two games apiece. There would be some symmetry to this, as injury did rob us of one half of the epic matchup we were promised, but that would hardly remove the asterisk: it would only transfer it from the Heat to whatever team ended up taking their place.

Until suddenly, Gregg Popovich, Tim Duncan, and the San Antonio Spurs came running to the rescue.

The only way to eliminate an “asterisk” is to completely change the narrative. In the past, I have referred to the San Antonio Spurs as the NBA’s “Forgotten Dynasty.” That isn’t entirely accurate. No one has really forgotten Tim Duncan’s Spurs from the 2000s… they just don’t like to talk about them, because there isn’t anything sexy or flashy about them. They play fundamentally sound basketball, their main superstar is humble and genuinely seems like a nice guy. I don’t think he’s ever given an interesting interview or done anything controversial in his life. The brand of basketball they play is only entertaining to people who actually like basketball. Casual fans often refer to them as “boring.”

Well, this “boring” team is tearing through the Western Conference playoffs. They swept the hapless Utah Jazz in the first round by scores of 15, 31, 12, and 6. In the second round, a win tonight would give them a sweep over the much flashier Los Angeles Clippers after three straight victories by margins of 16, 17, and 10.

This dominant performance has some wondering whether this is actually the best Spurs team of the Popovich/Duncan Era, an era that I will remind you was supposed to be winding down. In a sense, this is much like last year’s Dallas Mavericks narrative, except they’ve been here before, and it would help further cement their status as one of the best NBA dynasties of all time.

The way they’re tearing through the playoffs brings this team to a level beyond “impressive,” beyond “dominant.” It’s when we start using words like “scary.” It’s when we realize we’re witnessing something special.

So, yes. We should remember this season because of the rash of playoff injuries, and what it says about the irresponsibility of the NBA’s reckless post-Lockout scheduling. We should remember Derrick Rose, Chris Paul, Blake Griffin, Dwight Howard, and yes even Chris Bosh.

But most of all, we should remember the San Antonio Spurs. Without an asterisk.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers