Tag Archives: Major League Baseball

Baseball’s Real Scandal: The Steroids Era vs. the Segregation Era

In failing to elect not only Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Sammy Sosa, and others suspected or proven to have used performance enhancing drugs, but indeed failing to elect anyone at all, the Major League Baseball Hall of Fame sent a clear statement about the so-called Steroids Era. It has been suggested that no one from the Steroids Era ought to be elected because even if they didn’t use performance enhancing drugs, they allowed it to happen by not speaking up and not doing more to clean up the sport.

Except, you know, that makes absolutely no sense.

I find the suggestion that players committed a grave sin–one that should exclude entire decades of baseball players from the annals of baseball immortality–in failing to speak up or do something about performance enhancing drugs downright insulting considering the players we have let in the Hall of Fame. I could talk about all the ways the rules have changed. I could talk about what pitchers used to be allowed to do to baseballs to make them dance. I could talk about the hypocrisy of a group of journalists punishing players for not speaking up when those same journalists didn’t speak up even though it’s actually their job. But I don’t have to. Because there is a much, much simpler reason I find this attitude so outright distasteful that it makes me feel almost ill every time I hear it.

Punish players for not speaking up about performance enhancing drugs? Okay. As long as you’re ready to throw out every single Hall of Famer that played a single inning before April 15, 1947.

Yeah, you heard me right. Babe Ruth? Gone. Cy Young? Out. Lou Gehrig? See ya.

You think not speaking up about performance enhancing drugs is bad? How about not speaking up about the fact that only caucasians were allowed to play baseball?

Just let that sink in for a moment. Players are being punished not just because they are suspected of using performance enhancing drugs, but because they didn’t speak up about the issue. Because they didn’t “do something” about it. Never mind the fact that it’s actually the job of the Commissioner of Baseball, the Players’ Union, and those same journalists who are now blaming the players for not “doing something”… but you really want to tell me that performance enhancing drugs are a bigger problem for baseball than institutionalized racism? Seriously. Please get some perspective.

There’s been a lot of talk of adding an asterisk to Barry Bonds’ home run record, and that’s fine. I understand the rationale behind it completely. But if we’re going to do that, the first number to have an asterisk next to it should be 714. That’s how many home runs Babe Ruth hit, and he hit them playing exclusively against other white players. He retired 12 years before Jackie Robinson suited up for the Brooklyn Dodgers.

Cy Young had 511 career wins, each and every one of them against all-white teams. Jackie Robinson’s first game would come 36 years after Young’s last. Lou Gehrig’s 2,130 consecutive games played were all played in a white-only league, the last game of the streak coming 8 years before Robinson’s debut. Joe DiMaggio’s 56-game hitting streak saw him facing only white pitchers, 6 years before Jackie Robinson stepped onto a Major League Baseball field.

So say these players from the Steroids Era were “tainted,” but then look me in the eye and tell me the players you consider the “greatest of all time” weren’t. Better yet, tell Jackie Robinson that. Tell Hank Aaron. Yes, even tell Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa. Tell them that there being nearly a century during which they wouldn’t have been allowed to play ball because of the color of their skin isn’t a bigger deal than widespread use of performance enhancing drugs. And that period of baseball history isn’t something people make a show of being embarrassed about, something they call the Segregation Era. They act like it was some kind of  mythic Golden Age.

I’m not saying I know the “right” way to deal with the steroids issue, but to suggest that an entire generation of ballplayers should be shunned from the Hall of Fame for failing to speak up about steroids when we give a free pass to several generations that didn’t speak up about segregation is, frankly, insulting. And if you agree with the Hall of Fame voters that PEDs are a bigger deal than segregation, I can’t help you.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

2012 Hall of Fame Class: This is going to be INTERESTING.

Actually, it already is interesting.

It somehow escaped my attention until it became the lead story on ESPN today that Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Sammy Sosa are going to be on the Hall of Fame ballot for the first time together. This is going to end up being the defining precedent of how the Hall of Fame treats the “steroids era,” and we already pretty much know how it’s going to turn out. The Hall of Fame voting process is too big of a mess for them to come to any kind of consensus on how players ought to be evaluated, meaning there’s absolutely no way any of these guys are getting in.

That might be the outcome you want, but the way we get there is absolutely not okay. Why? ESPN’s coverage of this issue has actually been pretty exceptional, and I’ll turn to one of the two excellent articles I want to share with you tonight, this one by David Schoenfield:

It’s a mess. You could hardly devise a worse system, one in which 500-plus voters with varying degrees of knowledge assess the pool of candidates with few guidelines.

You have voters who won’t vote for players who used performance-enhancing drugs.

You have voters who won’t vote for players they suspect used performance-enhancing drugs.

You have voters who won’t vote for players who had big muscles.

Yeah. It’s going to turn into a witch hunt. If you think steroid users shouldn’t be included, Bonds, Clemens, Sosa and (when he becomes eligible after he retires) Alex Rodriguez are clearly out. But you know it isn’t going to stop there. This thing is an absolute mess. What it needs is clear criteria for evaluating a player, including what to do about PED use or (perhaps more importantly) suspected PED use.

A bit more from Schoenfield:

You have columnists voting who mostly covered the NFL or NBA and saw maybe three baseball games a year and can’t tell Edgar Martinez from Carmelo Martinez.

You have a pool of voters that doesn’t include Vin Scully, Bill James, Bob Costas, John Thorn, Joe Torre or anybody else who isn’t a 10-year member of the BBWAA.

This, to me, is by far the biggest problem with this system, and I am really glad Schoenfield pointed it out. Do you want to know how ridiculous this is? You don’t have to go any further than Wikipedia. (Seriously.)

Bill James, the man who is the most directly responsible for how we understand player performance today. This guy: George William “Bill” James is an American baseball writer, historian, and statistician whose work has been widely influential. Since 1977, James has written more than two dozen books devoted to baseball history and statistics.

Vin Scully? Only the most respected sports broadcaster of any sport. This guy: Vincent Edward “Vin” Scully is an American sportscaster, best known as the play-by-play announcer for the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team ever since the Dodgers moved to Los Angeles in 1957.

1957! Do you know who was the Los Angeles Dodgers announcer before him? No one! Because they were the Brooklyn Dodgers! He’s been a fixture of baseball for as long as the Los Angeles Dodgers!

John Thorn? He’s just baseball’s official historian. I’m sure he wouldn’t have anything useful to contribute.

Come on, guys. This is clearly broken. Whether you agree with the solutions Schoenfield has suggested in his article (I’ll let you read those for yourself) or not (I’m not certain I entirely do), something clearly has to be done.

The last thing I want to comment on is a relatively minor part of this story, but it comes from ESPN’s feature article on this subject:

Schilling, who works as an analyst for ESPN, knows how he would vote if he had a ballot.

“I wouldn’t vote for them ever,” he told “SportsCenter” when asked about Bonds, Clemens and Sosa.

Hardly the only guy to have that attitude. Here’s what makes it interesting, though. A few paragraphs earlier:

Craig Biggio, Mike Piazza and Curt Schilling are among the 24 first-time eligibles.

Okay, hold up for a second. Baseball writers can only choose 10 “yes” votes on a Hall of Fame ballot. I think that’s stupid, by the way, but without getting into that… is Curt Schilling campaigning for his Hall of Fame election using his position as a member of the media? And if he is… is there any way in which that isn’t one of the biggest conflicts of interest we’ve ever seen in the history of sports media? I’m not trying to overstate here, but… can you name a bigger one?

Guys, I’m in completely sports journalism junkie overdrive here. I’m sure it’ll take me a month or two to become tired of this story to the point of being disgusted with it. Trust me: the sports media is good at doing that, with SportsCenter top stories like, “We have absolutely nothing new to report about this, and we’re not even going to summarize what we already know about it, but our ratings guys tell us that we need to lead with this.” But for now, like I said… full sports journalism junkie overdrive.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Programming Reminders

8:00 pm
Game 7 of the NLCS. Watch the St. Louis Cardinals (a team Kat has increasingly fallen in love with) take on the San Francisco Giants to determine who will advance to the World Series. Live from AT&T Park in San Francisco, California (FOX)

8:30 pm
Monday Night Football. Watch the Chicago Bears (Kat’s favorite sports team since childhood) take on the Detroit Lions to determine whether Chicago will enjoy a nationally-telecast coming out party and cement their status as many people’s surprising Super Bowl favorites. Live from Soldier Field in Chicago, Illinois (ESPN)

9:00 pm
The Final Presidential Debate. Watch President Barack Obama take on Governor Mitt Romney to determine the future of our country. Live from Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida (CSPAN, ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC)

9:01 pm
Watch Kat suffer a nervous breakdown as she tries to choose between these events of great personal significance with laggy internet that will only let her stream one of them. Live from Cat Castle in Providence, Rhode Island.

(All times Eastern.)

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Possible World Series Matchups

The St. Louis Cardinals just pulled off the largest comeback in an elimination game in the history of baseball, and I’m not even a little surprised. That is some serious magic right there.

On one of my old blogs, I had a tradition of breaking down the four possible Super Bowl matchups prior to the Conference Championship games. At a reader’s suggestion, I started doing the same for other sports. So here we go.

1. The Rematch Series: Cardinals/Tigers
I have been all-in for this matchup two years in a row now. The Cardinals losing Pujols should theoretically make this less interesting to me, but how about the way the Cardinals have managed to maintain one of the best offenses in baseball without arguably the best hitter in baseball? Plus, you have to love the idea of that Tigers rotation (headlined by Verlander) going against the reinforced Cardinals rotation with Adam Wainwright back from Tommy John surgery. You have to. It’s the law.

2. The Dynasty Series: Cardinals/Yankees
The Yankees (27) and Cardinals (11) have the first and second most World Series wins. They represent the most successful franchises in the history of baseball.

3. The “Insert Storyline Here” Series: Giants/Tigers
If Tim Lincecum were still alive, you could bill this as an incredible pitching showcase.

4. The Relocation Series: Giants/Yankees
I guess the real story here would be there’s very little chance I’d watch an entire inning of any of these games.

Tagged , ,

MLB Playoff Predictions

Considering I started my Wild Card Showdown predictions with a disclaimer that individual baseball games are nearly impossible to predict, it seems only fair that I got both games wrong, right? So it was actually nice of the Cardinals and Orioles to prove me right by proving me wrong. (Yeah, we’re going with that.) It really was a shame to see Chipper Jones’s career end amid so much controversy, though. And perhaps an even bigger shame to see this new format ushered in in such a way, as a lot of fans will be extremely critical and suspicious of it from now on, even though a blown call could’ve happened just as easily in, say, Game 5 of a five-game series, or Game 7 of a seven-game series.

Getting back to my original point, I feel I should explain what I hastily wrote yesterday (in order to get my picks in before the games started.) Baseball is different from other sports in the sense that its postseason doesn’t resemble its regular season at all. Why is this? Because out of every sport, baseball has the lowest probabilities of success.

In the NBA, the average shooting percentage is usually in the 40s, while good shooters commonly shoot in the high 50s. Given the number of shots taken in a game, if you average that out over a game, the better team is usually going to end up scoring the ball more. Furthermore, basketball relies on other predictable factors like which team has better playmakers that are able to get to the rim or make other plays happen. In football, a good quarterback will complete around 60% of his passes, and good teams will be able to physically dominate their opponents and will score dramatically more points than bad teams in individual games.

Baseball is not like this. In baseball, the greatest hitters of all time might hit .400 once in their career. It doesn’t happen often; it’s happened 13 times in the 20th century. To put that in perspective, it means they successfully get a base hit in 40% of their at-bats not counting walks, hit-by-pitches, or other situations that would cause them not to have an official at-bat. A great hitter will hit around .350 (there may be one or two of these a year), which translates to succeeding 35% of the time. The league average is usually around .260, which is 26%. You get the idea. Home runs? Even more difficult to predict. 40 is considered the baseline for an extremely good year for a home run hitter, which in a 162-game schedule means a hitter having a very good year will hit a home run in just under 25% of their games (not factoring in the fact that they may have a few multi-home run games, which will bring that percentage down further.)

The reason good teams succeed and bad teams don’t in the regular season is because over 162 games, a lot of these statistics will “average out” such that the good teams will win more games. However, a lot of success in the regular season relies on depth. The postseason is a completely different animal. Nearly any team can beat nearly any other team in a 5- or 7-game series, let alone a single game. So it is pretty common for MLB Playoff predictions to be wildly inaccurate to the point of absolute futility. So, why make them at all? Well… I don’t know, it’s just what we do.

National League Division Series
St. Louis over Washington in 4 Games
I see St. Louis winning their first two home games, Washington rallying to take their home opener, and St. Louis winning in either Game 4 or Game 5. This new 2-3 format really confuses me a great deal because it seems to cede the momentum of home field advantage to the team with the lower record. A series needs to go the full five games for the team with “home field advantage” to actually play more games at home than their opponents. Bizarre.

Cincinnati over San Francisco in 5 Games
As much fun as it would be to see the two most recent World Series winners face each other, I think Cincinnati can both out-pitch and out-hit San Francisco.

American League Division Series
New York over Baltimore in 4 Games
The Yankees have the potential to overpower just about anyone in the postseason, and Baltimore did them an enormous favor by knocking off their main competition (although the Rangers did stumble their way through the end of the regular season.)

Detroit over Oakland in 4 Games
I’m going to be honest: I really wanted to pick Oakland over New York for the ALCS just for the beautiful epilogue it would provide for Moneyball, or better yet the theatrical sequel it would give us (Moneyball 2! Tell me you’re not all-in for this!) But Detroit is an extremely top-heavy team (which is what you actually want in the postseason), which explains why they had less success in the regular season than Oakland. Then again, Oakland is a very streaky team, so maybe they’re about to go on a 2007 Colorado Rockies-like tear through the AL playoffs. I would definitely not complain.

National League Championship Series
Cincinnati over St. Louis in 6 Games
Last year, although many would disagree with me, St. Louis had the benefit of facing an inferior opponent in the NLCS. This would clearly not be the case this year, although St. Louis is more than capable of pulling another upset by simply out-muscling their opponents. (A lot of people forget that losing Albert Pujols didn’t stop the Cardinals from being the best-hitting team in the league.)

Detroit over New York in 7 Games
This may be wishful thinking, but Detroit certainly seems to have the firepower to overcome the Yankees, plus potential back-to-back Cy Young winner Justin Verlander should get a chance to pitch twice unless there’s a sweep.

World Series
Detroit over Cincinnati in 7 Games
Prince Fielder captures his first World Series just one year after Albert Pujols captures his second, Miguel Cabrera and Justin Verlander get rings to help further validate them as the best pitcher and hitter in baseball. A lot to like here.

Too bad almost none of this will probably happen. Given the wild unpredictability of the MLB postseason, feel free to jot down the opposite of all of this.

I love October.

Tagged , , ,

Very quick MLB Wild Card Showdown picks

Baseball is arguably the most unpredictable sport, especially in the postseason. Predicting the outcome of a single baseball game is almost laughably futile. Which is what makes the MLB’s new Wild Card Showdown format so amazing. That being said, let’s do it anyway!

Braves over Cardinals. This just “feels” right, especially with it being Chipper’s last year. You can’t really go wrong having either team in the postseason any year, though.

Rangers over Orioles. I was all excited to pick the shocking upset, but Joe Saunders hasn’t ever won a game in Arlington. That doesn’t bode well against a desperate team with World Series talent.

Tagged , , ,

In this corner: alleged xenophobia! In the other corner: blatant sexism!

Last night, New York Yankee star first baseman Mark Teixeira hit a two-run triple against Boston Red Sox middle relief pitcher Vicente Padilla. For anyone watching the game, there was the interesting subtext that the two had been teammates with the Texas Rangers a few years ago, but that sort of thing happens in baseball often enough that I wouldn’t be writing an article about it if that were the extent of it.

What happened afterward is nothing short of a public relations nightmare for both players. Apparently the two had been involved in a feud that dated back to when both played for the Rangers, a feud which became very public after last night’s game.

The short version is,  Teixeira alleged that Padilla had been head-hunting (intentionally throwing at him with an intent to injure him) ever since they stopped being teammates, and that his tendency to throw at other players put his own teammates at risk because opposing pitchers would naturally retaliate. Padilla responded by alleging that Teixeira was prejudiced against Latin players and would probably be more comfortable playing a “women’s game.”

For anyone who thinks I’m overreacting here, we need no further proof of Padilla’s sexism than his own words. When asked to retract his statement because it was insulting to female athletes, Padilla declined, stating that “we are all men” in baseball and that there was nothing wrong with what he said. If the allegation regarding Teixeira’s bias against Latin players is also true, I am frankly embarrassed for both players, and Major League Baseball in general. Just what we need: a feud between a sexist player on one hand and a xenophobic player on the other hand.

Aside from the obvious lack of professionalism on the players’ part, I think the most embarrassing thing in this mess is that Padilla, in the process of accusing another player of being biased against Latin athletes, showed an utter lack of respect for women, and didn’t see any problem with that even when directly asked about it after the fact.

I’m just embarrassed for both of these players. No one comes out of this looking good. It looks quite a bit worse for Padilla whose prejudice is on record and unapologetic (which also hurts the credibility of his allegations against Teixeira), but the entire situation is just so painfully awkward for both players.

(Hey, look: all it takes to get me to actually talk about the over-hyped Red Sox/Yankees rivalry is a conflict between two allegedly prejudiced players!)

Tagged , , , , ,

My ESPY Award Votes

Since 1993, ESPN has hosted the sports world’s equivalent of the Oscars: the ESPY Awards. It has its problems. There have been many years where the nominees (and winners) have been infuriating, and having fans vote for the final winners doesn’t seem like very good selection criteria to me at all, but we have a pretty good candidate pool this year, and since this is the only awards show we get as sports fans, I may as well weigh in.

(Note: I’m skipping the individual sport categories like “Best NBA Athlete” that they don’t show on television anyway.)

Best Male Athlete
LeBron James, Miami Heat, NBA
Two of the other competitors (Aaron Rodgers, Justin Verlander) experienced a similar level of dominance in their respective sports, but were missing one thing: a ring to show for it at the end. I came the closest to voting for Justin Verlander because he won the American League Pitching Triple Crown, Cy Young Award, and MVP Award, but LeBron James won the NBA’s regular season Most Valuable Player and Finals Most Valuable Player awards. But the biggest reason to pick James? It isn’t often that the best player in his sport so dramatically rewrites the narrative of their career in a single season. When we look back on this sports year decades from now, we might not remember the regular season brilliance of Rodgers and Verlander, but we will definitely remember what LeBron James did.

Best Female Athlete
Brittney Griner, Baylor University, NCAA Basketball
Griner was dominant as she led her team to a perfect season and national championship and won pretty much every individual trophy there is to win in NCAA Basketball, making her the easy choice here. (I have to say, I’m a little frustrated that the candidate pool here didn’t include WNBA or NFPS professional athletes.)

Best Championship Performance
LeBron James, Miami Heat, NBA
With all due respect to David Freese of the St. Louis Cardinals for his heroics in the NLCS and World Series, LeBron James took over the Miami Heat and the NBA by finally cashing in on his nearly limitless potential. This is the first time in his career that LeBron has indisputably been not only the most talented player in the NBA, but the best player in the NBA. His performance in the 2012 NBA Playoffs and (especially) 2012 NBA Finals erased any doubt.

Best Breakthrough Athlete
Rob Gronkowski, New England Patriots, NFL
Another easy choice. Anthony Davis is going to be the first pick in the NBA draft and Robert Griffin III was the second round pick of the NFL draft, but they haven’t done anything against professional competition. Jeremy Lin was a Twitter sensation, but it’s questionable whether he’s going to continue to be a star with the Knicks if the team can’t play at a high level with him, Carmelo Anthony, and Amar’e Stoudamire on the court together. Gronk’s emergence as one of the best tight ends in football was key to the New England Patriots’ return to the Super Bowl, and there’s no reason to think he’s going to disappear anytime soon.

Best Record-Breaking Performance
Drew Brees, New Orleans Saints, NFL
I haven’t exactly hidden my feelings about the New Orleans Saints in light of the Bountygate scandal, and Drew Brees has been embarrassingly vocal in his coach and team’s defense, so you have to believe I would’ve picked anyone else here if I could justify it. But Brees’ breaking Dan Marino’s “unbreakable” single-season passing record is not only one of the most impressive record-breaking performances in recent years, it’s the only actual athletic feat on this list. The other three all deal with age (two career milestones and one “youngest winner” status), which don’t impress me nearly as much.

Best Upset
Los Angeles Kings win the Stanley Cup, NHL
I badly wanted to pick Lehigh over Duke, but can we really count Duke getting bounced in the early rounds of the NCAA tournament as a “huge” upset anymore? Does it really surprise people? It seems to happen more often than not. The Kings, on the other hand, aren’t on this list because of one upset. They’re on this list because of four upsets, in seven-game series, in the playoffs. The entire reason every sport but football has multi-game series in the playoffs is to dramatically increase the odds of the best team winning. So how do you explain the 8th-seeded Los Angeles defeating the Western Conference’s #1, #2, and #3 seeded teams one after another and then hoisting the Stanley Cup? Let’s be honest: this is insane.

Don’t tell me I should vote for one of the two NCAA Tournament upsets (which we have dozens of every year) or the equally obligatory regular season college football upset over this. Just don’t.

Best Game
World Series Game 6, St. Louis Cardinals 10, Texas Rangers 9, MLB
This is easily the best candidate pool on the entire ballot (you can tell because they only bothered picking three games), and quite possibly the best “Best Game” candidate pool you’ll ever see. In addition to a great comeback by Kansas over rival Missouri in the last regular season conference play game the two will ever play, you have two games I recently described (here and here) as being sports-film worthy. The San Francisco 49ers divisional round win over New Orleans was easily one of the best NFL playoff games in years, but Game 6 of the 2011 World Series might well go down as the greatest World Series game of all time.

Best Moment
MLB Regular Season Ends
In a portent of the drama of the World Series, the old Wild Card format went out with a bang by delivering the most dramatic final day of regular season baseball ever. Four games decided two Wild Card races. Three of the four were decided in the ninth inning or extra innings. Two went into extra innings. Two were won by walk-off hits. One featured a seven-run comeback highlighted by A) a grand slam, B) a two-out, two-strike ninth inning game-tying home run, and C) a two-out, two-strike, extra innings walk-off home run. When the dust settled, the two largest regular season collapses (or comebacks, depending on your perspective) in baseball history were complete.

Best Coach/Manager
Tom Coughlin, New York Giants, NFL
Don’t laugh. Who are you going to pick? Erik Soelstra? Consider this: Coughlin has won both of his Super Bowls (two in five years) against Bill Belichick.

Best Comeback Athlete
 Matthew Stafford, Detroit Lions, NFL
This was pretty easily the most difficult decision on the ballot. Sidney Crosby missed 10 months due to concussions but came back as the most dominant player in the NHL. (More success in the postseason easily could’ve put this one over the top.) Maria Sharapova came back from a near career-ending injury to win the 2012 French Open (making her only the 10th woman to have at least one career victory in all four Grand Slam events) and regain her ranking as the number one tennis player in the world. Johan Santana came back from Tommy John Surgery to reestablish himself as one of the most dominant pitchers in the game, and pitched the first no-hitter in New York Mets history.

But Matthew Stafford came back from injury-plagued seasons to pass for over 5,000 yards and 40 touchdowns, and lead the Detroit Lions (yeah, those Detroit Lions) to the playoffs for the first time since 1999. His comeback year was a double-wammy, because it was also a comeback (and breakthrough) year for what had been one of the most maligned franchises in professional sports.

Best Male College Athlete
Anthony Davis, University of Kentucky, NCAA Basketball
Andrew Luck might be the best NFL prospect since Peyton Manning, but Anthony Davis won the Wooden and Naismith Awards as Player of the Year in the regular season as well as the NCAA Tournament Most Outstanding Player award en route to leading Kentucky to the National Championship.

Best Female College Athlete
Brittney Griner, Baylor University, NCAA Basketball
As already stated, Griner won every individual award there was to win en route to leading her team to a perfect season and national championship.

Best Team
Baylor Women’s Basketball
Was anyone else undefeated? Okay then.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sports Movies vs. Real Life. Part IV: The Greatest Sports Story Ever Played

Okay. I’m going to start this one with a challenge: read this completely, 100% factually accurate description of what happened in the last two months of the 2011 Major League Baseball season, and tell me you couldn’t (if you really had to) make it into one of the greatest sports films of all time.

While my examples in Parts II and III relied largely on external events, and big picture, “good guy” vs. “bad guy” dynamics (though both were spectacular games in their own right), my final example does not have any such clear distinctions. The compelling part of this narrative is the sport itself. It is the epitome of an underdog story, with unlikely comebacks galore. For my money, the best “sports movie” fodder out there that someone has to make into a film sometime before I die is the improbable story of the 2011 St. Louis Cardinals.

This team’s journey represented the end of several eras. It was the end of both Albert Pujols’ and Tony La Russa’s tenures in St. Louis. It was the end of the Wild Card format as we’ve known it since 1994. None of the above would go gentle into that good night.

The drama actually started before the playoffs, in September. And the Cardinals weren’t alone. But you wouldn’t have been able to tell at the beginning of the month. Simply put, baseball had no pennant races in 2011. The only real drama was whether the Yankees or Red Sox would be crowned champions of the American League East. On September 1st the Red Sox held a half game lead over the arch-rival New York Yankees, who held a commanding 8.5 game lead in the Wild Card race. In the National League, the Atlanta Braves held a similar 8.5 game margin over the St. Louis Cardinals.

And then this funny thing started happening. Toward the middle of September, people in Georgia and New England started talking very anxiously. Their beloved Braves and Sox seemed to have lost the ability to win games. No one could explain it. Especially in Boston’s case. Their roster was just absolutely loaded. Any expert that didn’t have “Phillies vs. Red Sox” as their World Series pick was just trying to be different.

And then they just kept losing.

The tone of the conversation shifted. The Cardinals and Rays were too far back to take advantage, everyone reasoned. The Braves and Red Sox had to win eventually. Honestly, there had never been a collapse like this one in the Wild Card Era. Never. And, as everyone knows, once you get into the playoffs anything can happen.

But the Braves and Red Sox kept losing. And the Cardinals and Rays kept winning.

Toward the end of the month, leads crept further and further down. 4 games. 3 games. 2 games. And then, on September 26th, something truly remarkable happened: the Boston Red Sox dropped into a tie with the Tampa Bay Rays, with matching 89-71 records. The next day, September 27th, the Atlanta Braves matched their ignoble feat by falling into a tie with the St. Louis Cardinals, 89-72 their matching marks. These events were simply without precedent.

Having just moved to the New England area after years of hating Boston-area teams, I will admit to having felt quite a bit of schadenfreude over the collapse of a mighty dynasty with a sickeningly high payroll. But that isn’t why I’m writing this. I’m writing this because of what happened in those days, those weeks. People talked about baseball in September. Everyone talked about baseball. During a time when baseball is generally an afterthought unless your team was in postseason contention, the internet, the radio, television… everyone felt something about what was going on in regular season baseball. Some, like me, were amused. Others were increasingly infuriated and frustrated. But suddenly regular season baseball mattered again.

September 28th, 2011 was the last day of the regular season. At the beginning of the day, the impossible had happened: both Wild Card races, which had been 8.5-game laughers at the beginning of the month, were tied. The Red Sox and Rays were tied at 90 wins and 71 losses; the Braves and Cardinals at 89 and 72.

As that day dawned, anything could happen. The Braves and Red Sox could both “back in” to the playoffs, as they say, their postgame celebrations a muted affair leaving us with more questions than answers. One or both could be forced to play a one-game playoff against a team they had held a seemingly insurmountable lead over at the beginning of the month.

Or the improbable, the impossible, the unthinkable could happen: both teams could be eliminated from postseason contention, setting the stage for two stories that would be shocking even if they happened by themselves.

This was, without any possibility of argument, the most dramatic final day of regular season play in Wild Card Era baseball.

Four games began at roughly the same time. Phillies/Braves, Cardinals/Astros, Red Sox/Orioles, and Yankees/Rays. With both races tied, the outcomes of these games would determine the fate of the Wild Card in both leagues.

The only game of the four that featured almost no drama saw Chris Carpenter shut out the Astros while his offense put 5 runs on the board in the first inning, and never looked back, winning a no-contest 8 to 0.

The Braves’ fate was sealed in a dramatic 13-inning affair against their arch rival Philadelphia, which saw the Braves leading 3-2 going into the 9th inning, only to see a 9th-inning rally tie the game, and a bloop single provide the winning run in the 13th inning. The National League Wild Card winner had been crowned.

But we were far from done.

Far more dramatic were the two decisive American League games. Early on, there was no such drama. The Rays watched with dismay as the Yankees jumped out to a 7 to 0 lead early in the game. The Red Sox had a much slimmer 3 to 2 lead over the Orioles before rain delayed the start of the 7th inning, but they went into the delay confident that their worst case scenario was a one-game playoff the next day. Surely the Rays would not be able to overcome a 7-run deficit.

The Rays loaded the bases in the 8th inning. The Yankees walked in a run, and it was 7-1. Sean Rodriguez was hit by a pitch, and it was 7-2. B.J. Upton hit a sacrifice fly, and it was 7-3. And then, with two outs, Evan Longoria hit his 30th home run of the season and suddenly the impossible was possible. It was a one run game. And Tropicana Field (for once almost full) was going crazy.

That was all for the eighth inning. And, with the Red Sox still rain delayed, the Rays came up in the bottom of the ninth inning. The first two batters were retired without incident. And Cory Wade, closer for the night, had Dan Johnson on the ropes. It wasn’t just the last inning. It wasn’t just the last out. It was the last strike. Johnson hit one of the most dramatic home runs you will ever see, and the Rays had come all the way back.

Play resumed in Boston as extra innings began in Tampa. The Red Sox clung to a 1-run advantage until the ninth inning. They sent one of the best closers in baseball to the mound to seal the deal. But, in a fitting testament to the season as a whole, talent alone was not enough to ensure victory.

After striking out the first two batters, Papelbon gave up a double. And then a ground rule double. The game was tied, and a runner was still in scoring position for Robert Andino.

The count was 1-1. Papelbon threw a 90 mile-an-hour splitter that Andino hit toward left fielder Carl Crawford of all people. Reimold was running on contact. Despite a diving attempt, the highly paid, much maligned outfielder saw the ball pop out of his glove, and he airmailed the throw to home. The Orioles, a team that hasn’t been to the playoffs since Cal Ripken Jr. patrolled shortstop, were celebrating on the field on the last day of the regular season.

Less than three minutes later, with the fans still going crazy because the final score of the Red Sox game had just been posted on the scoreboard, Evan Longoria was at the plate facing Scott Proctor in the 12th inning.

How else could it possibly end? Evan Longoria put it in the seats for his 31st home run of the season, and the Rays were going to the playoffs.

I have never seen, and don’t expect to soon see, a more dramatic last day of regular season play. You can forgive me for assuming that the playoffs were going to be a letdown after the drama that unfolded in late September.

I was wrong. Three of the four Division Series went the distance, and the Philadelphia Phillies and New York Yankees, who had been cemented at Number One and Number Two in the power rankings for most of the season (interrupted by brief visits from Boston) were eliminated in the first round.

The League Championship Series were both 6-game affairs, the National League variety made more interesting by the fact that the Cardinals and Brewers were division rivals, and Albert Pujols and Prince Fielder were facing each other in Cardinals and Brewers uniforms probably for the last time. The real story, though, was the way the postsesaon unofficial rulebook was being rewritten: for decades, starting pitching has determined your success in the postseason. No more. The Cardinals and Rangers would face each other in a World Series in which none of their starting pitchers had recorded a quality start in the League Championship Series.

Though though the Rays’ Cindarella story had ended with a first round exit, the Cardinals found themselves in the World Series for the third time in seven years.

I need to stop here for a moment so we can reflect on this. The Cardinals had been written off before the season even started. They had lost their ace pitcher, Adam Wainwright, to Tommy John Surgery before he threw a single pitch in a regular season game. Albert Pujols’ impending free agency loomed over the entire year. There just seemed to be too many things going wrong for this team.

So the stage was set for the best World Series in my lifetime. Shockingly, despite seeing the impossible happen in so many different phases of the game, despite the eerily similar circumstances under which the underdog Cardinals stole the series from the heavily favored Detroit Tigers in 2006, almost every expert picked the Texas Rangers to win. The Cardinals were written off one more time.

The Cardinals got a strong start from Chris Carpenter in Game 1, and took the game 3-2 behind timely hitting and yet another gem from their bullpen. Low-scoring games in the World Series have a special kind of intensity, one where every play, ever small moment is magnified. This was one of those games.

Continuing the theme of surprisingly strong starting pitching that neither team had demonstrated elsewhere in the playoffs, Jaime Garcia and Colby Lewis held the game scoreless through six innings. It took a dramatic 2-run ninth inning and a save from Neftali Feliz for the Rangers to take a Game 2 that was almost a mirror image of Game 1.

Albert Pujols absorbed a great deal of criticism for leaving the stadium without addressing the media after Game 2. He responded with the greatest individual performance in World Series history in Game 3. Albert was 5-6, tying Paul Molitor’s record for hits in a World Series game, Babe Ruth and Reggie Jackson’s record three home runs in a World Series game, Hideki Matsui and Bobby Richardson’s record of 6 RBIs in a World Series game, and setting a new record with 14 total bases in a World Series game. Unsurprisingly behind such an unparalleled performance, the Cardinals won in a rout, 16-7.

Game 4 saw a shocking gem from Rangers’ starter Derek Holland, who pitched 8 1/3 innings of two-hit baseball, and the Rangers took the contest 4-0.

Game 5 was another close contest, this time featuring an uncharacteristic Cardinals meltdown when closer Jason Motte was unavailable to pitch in the decisive 8th inning, when the Rangers took (and would hold) a 4-2 lead.

One more time, the Cardinals were written off. People started talking about which Ranger should be the MVP of the Series (Mike Napoli seemed to be the popular pick). The Rangers seemed to give ample reason for this when Adrian Beltre and Nelson Cruz hit back-to-back homers and Ian Kinsler added an RBI single in the top of the 7th inning to break a 4-4 tie and give the Rangers a 7-4 lead.

In the bottom of the 9th inning, the lead was still 7-5, and closer Neftali Perez came in to end the Cardinals’ cindarella series. He got Ryan Theriot swinging but gave up a double to Pujols and walked Lance Berkman. He recovered to strike Allen Craig looking, and suddenly the Cardinals were down to their last out.

Up to the plate stepped the unlikely NLCS MVP. On a team with the likes of Albert Pujols, Lance Berkman, and Matt Holliday, the big hero of the postseason thus far had been David Freese. And they needed him to be it again with the season on the line.

That wasn’t dramatic enough.

Perez worked the count to 1-2, and suddenly the Cardinals were down not only to their last out, but their last strike. Remember with me, if you will, another team that faced this same situation. Season on the line. One pitch away from losing it all.

David Freese didn’t put it in the seats, but he did hit a triple to right field, scoring Albert Pujols and Lance Berkman and tying the game at 7-all.

The Cardinals’ joy would seemingly be short lived. In the top of the 10th, Josh Hamilton hit a two-run homer, his first of the series, and just like that the Cardinals were staring elimination in the face yet again.

The Cardinals scored one run on Ryan Theriot’s groundout, but that run came at the cost of once again bringing them to the brink. Berkman came to the plate with two outs, and with a 2-2 count, the Cardinals were once again down to their last strike.

But by now you know the Rangers never got it. Berkman rifled a line drive to center field, and the Cardinals scored to tie the game.

One inning later, in the bottom of the 11th, the first batter of the inning was none other than David Freese, who two innings ago had saved the Cardinals from elimination. He took a full-count pitch to center field, and the most stunning World Series comeback I’ve ever seen was complete.

Now, you can be forgiven for pointing out that Game 7 was pretty forgettable, comparatively. But after the two largest regular season collapses ever, the 2011 World Series gave us what many are calling the greatest single-game performance by any player in World Series history (Game 3) and what many are calling the greatest comeback in World Series history, and what some are calling the greatest game in World Series history, or even baseball history (Game 6). Yeah, Game 7 would be part of the ending montage (Like the Gold Medal game in Miracle?), but that hardly matters at this point.

The biggest problem with turning this into a movie is that it’s more unbelievable than any sports movie I’ve ever seen. Game 6 alone strains credulity to the point that anyone who wasn’t watching or listening to the game would find it impossible to believe that it was actually that dramatic.

We started with the popular notion that sports movies are “more dramatic” than real sports. While that is often true, and while sports movies might run the risk of diluting these incredibly rare occasions, this was at least one occasion when real life sports was far more dramatic than its film counterparts.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers