Category Archives: About

Refocus

So, you may notice that despite the fact that there are several compelling storylines going on in the NBA right now and my favorite NHL team just shattered the record for the best start to a regular season, I haven’t been talking about sports much lately. I also haven’t written about politics much lately.

These aren’t coincidences. I’ve decided to narrow the focus of this blog to writing reviews. I still might post the occasional interesting article about queer issues or something incredible that happens in the world of sports, but by and large what you’re going to see here from now on are reviews. Those are honestly what I enjoy writing the most, and what I think I’m the best at due to my academic background.

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Sexually lewd insults and/or threats?

(That last is in reference to a comment a while back indicating I was unfit to lick the boots of a public figure I was criticizing. Which was of course totally uncalled for, as I am both an experienced and enthusiastic bootlicker.)

So, I cover a range of topics (films, books, video games, professional sports, and politics, though I find myself trying to keep that last one to a minimum) and get comments every now and then, but maybe some people are more comfortable with a “mailbag” sort of feedback system, so I figured I may as well offer that as an option. So feel free to send any of the above my way at lovethinkspeakmailbag@gmail.com! Please sign your email with your first name, last initial (these can be real or a pseudonym), and city, or indicate that you would like to remain anonymous.

(And if you are going to use this venue to threaten my life or general well-being, I really do insist that such threats at least be creative.)

Tagged

Arguments Are Good

Sorry to go all “meta” in today’s post, but this really has to be said.

Conflict-avoidance is one of the most common strategies you’ll find in social situations, and it’s really not difficult to understand why. The thing is, arguments are actually a very, very good thing. The problem is that most people don’t know how to approach arguments and they end up turning into aggressive affairs involving a whole lot of personal attacks and very little of substance.

There is something that took me a very long time to learn, and something that I forget embarrassingly frequently: the goal of an argument. The entire point of an argument should be understanding someone else’s perspective and getting them to understand yours. The most positive possible result of an argument is one or (preferably) both parties saying, “I never looked at it that way.” Otherwise it’s just an unimaginably huge waste of time for everyone involved.

There are a lot of nitpicky details of etiquette to make things “go right,” but if both parties are considering an argument from this perspective, it’s actually pretty amazing how little effort it takes to make them productive.

Really?

In the category of “things that confuse the hell out of me,” it has recently come to my attention that some people consider my film and literature reviews (you can’t possibly make this up) “mean.”

As an English major, I was trained to read a text (which includes films) analytically. I then use this reading to construct arguments, both interpretive and evaluative. (If this sounds fairly unremarkable to you, congratulations! You know how a review works.) Does that mean I think I’m right?

… yes. It does.

I was surprised to learn that this is controversial. I don’t really know what to say other than, “This is how criticism works.” Why would anyone construct an argument they didn’t think was right?

One thing that seems to elude people is the difference between an opinion and an argument. I don’t like coffee. I know a lot of people who do. If we were to engage in a “debate” about the relative merits of drinking coffee, the results would be quite unsatisfactory. (“I don’t like this because it is coffee.” “I like this because it is coffee.”) I believe C.S. Lewis once made this same point, and probably stated it quite a bit more eloquently than I just did. This isn’t the sort of argument the critical process really encourages, and so it isn’t the kind I construct. I don’t say I loved The Avengers because superheroes are awesome, I say I loved The Avengers because Joss Whedon convinces audiences that superheroes are awesome.

Another part of the critical process is being willing to participate in (informed, civil) debate on the subject, and when appropriate to adjust one’s view when presented with sufficient contradictory data. Obviously there are certain standards of objective quality that we should be able to agree on, but not always. It’s entirely possible for two equally well-versed individuals to look at the same text and form contradictory but equally valid readings. The thing is (and this is what seems to piss people off), it’s also entirely possible that your reading (or my reading) is… well… wrong.

I know it doesn’t fit in well with the recent trend of encouraging people to just state their opinion and leave it at that as though we all live in a vacuum, but this is how this stuff is supposed to work. I read or watch, I interpret, I evaluate, I make an argument, I defend that argument. If that process bothers you, I suggest avoiding reviews altogether, not just mine. Thanks for reading.

Tagged ,

Transitioning at Work

I generally don’t blog about personal experiences, and I don’t intend to make a habit of it, but I think my store and the company I work for deserve recognition for what I’m about to relate.

My name is Katherine, and I am a Target team member. I am not being paid by my employer to make this statement, and in fact to my knowledge my employer is not at all aware that I am making this statement. When I began my employment relationship with Target, my name was not Katherine. It was Kevin.

I found acceptance as “Kevin,” a (mostly) gay male (actually, I was actively questioning my gender identity at the time), when I began working at Target. My coworkers were enthusiastic and excited to meet my boyfriend, just like they would’ve been to meet my girlfriend if I had had one instead. I was not treated any differently than any other team member, and I felt valued. At my old store in Illinois, I was considered a very important team member and saw my role expand considerably throughout my approximately year-long period of employment.

Shortly after I moved to Massachusetts, I had a series of personal revelations that I’m not going to relate here, the upshot of which was that I was neither a gay male nor “Kevin.” At first, I saw little reason to be out at work. After all, it’s not like I was going to be able to get sex-reassignment surgery tomorrow. So quite a while passed during which I inwardly squirmed every time I was misgendered by team members or guests. But it’s not like I could insist on being called a girl with a nametag on my chest that said “Kevin,” right?

My job satisfaction sunk to an all-time low. Unsurprising, because when I was with friends I could insist on being called (and considered) a girl. At work? Not so much. But then, there was a slim possibility that I’d be able to go on hormones, at which point it would obviously be very difficult for me to not be out at work. So I talked to my Human Resources Executive Team Lead.

Now… I expected the conversation to go well, because of Target’s incredibly supportive policies about diversity, and the fact that it was Human Resources (the department most likely to be familiar with those policies.) What I didn’t expect was to be told that I could change my nametag whenever I wanted, regardless of the progress (or lack thereof) with hormones. I could also insist on being called “she” and being open about being trans whenever I felt comfortable doing so. She did suggest talking to my team leads and the team members I worked with most closely first, but it was entirely up to me.

She also pledged the support of the entire executive team, and entreated me to let her (or them) know if I had any problems with team members or guests. When I told her I generally preferred to talk to people individually about that kind of thing if I could avoid involving HR or team leads, she said she thought that was the best approach and people would respect it.

Boy was she ever right!

Because of the smashing success that conversation was, I suddenly realized that coming out at work was a very realistic possibility. I had previously thought work would be the hardest/most awkward part about transitioning, but it was pretty clear to me that that was not the case. Even though getting the hormones didn’t end up working out (for now), I decided to go ahead and transition at work anyway. Frankly, I was chafing at being misgendered all the time, and seeing the realistic chance to change that was something that I immediately became very impatient for.

I first told my two direct team leaders, and both of them were wonderfully supportive and in one case actually actively excited. I promised both to be patient while people got used to it, and to answer any questions they (or others) had.

After a few weeks (mostly so she could order my new nametags and I could tell people), she called me into her office and surprised me with my new nametags. “Kat,” the diminutive form of my new name as I had requested. Although I didn’t put one of them on right away (I wanted to start a day of work as Katherine, to avoid more confusion than necessary), I felt like I was floating the rest of the day, I was so happy.

Last Monday was my first day at work as Katherine. A few people were thrown off at first, but when I explained it everyone was very positive about it. The HR executive actually pulled me aside and said that people had specifically come up to her and said, “I had a great conversation with Kat, I really appreciated how she handled telling me, she handled it very well.” I felt like I was glowing the whole rest of the day.

I’ve had to correct and remind a few people about my name/gender, but I’ve always been very careful to tell them that I’m not mad at them, and that I’m being completely patient and realistic in my expectations about how long this will take. And my patience has been returned by gratitude and genuine commitment on their part.

I mean, honestly, what would I have to gain by acting differently? By being combative and burning bridges instead of building them? This entire process has completely changed how I feel about being at work. I feel comfortable in my own skin, and that’s honestly the most important thing in the world.

Are there other stores I think I might’ve had a similar experience at? Perhaps. Especially a few that specifically have been in the news lately for being very friendly to queer issues. But there are also a lot (a lot) of stores where I imagine I wouldn’t have nearly as good of a time of it as I have at Target. And that’s the kind of environment that exists when a company is radically committed to diversity issues like Target is.

Again, I am not being paid to say what I’m saying, and in fact as far as I know no one at work knows I’m saying what I’m saying, but my personal experience has just been so overwhelming that I felt like I really, really needed to share it.

Thanks for reading.

Tagged , , , , , ,

The Fallacy of “Tolerating Intolerance.”

I have, on numerous occasions, encountered the peculiar belief that being radically (and oftentimes confrontationally) in favor of social justice must by some bizarre necessity include a self-defeating tolerance for discrimination.

Very small-minded individuals will tell you, quite smugly, that you cannot be truly open-minded without tolerating their racism, sexism, creedism, heterosexism, or whatever sort of bias they are trying to justify. They think they’ve discovered some kind of “trick” that explains why you can’t really be open-minded.

They are wrong.

It’s a transparently silly notion. I believe its mechanism relies on a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is to be in favor of social justice. Being inclusive does not imply a lack of discernment or values.

One personal example. When I cut ties with a former friend when it became increasingly obvious he was rather appallingly racist, he seemed to find the idea of not tolerating racism to be somehow self-defeating. He said I was being hypocritical for being so “tolerant” while not tolerating his racism. This is a profound misunderstanding. He was seeing the effect of a positive value (“I do not tolerate racism.”) This is not “tolerance.” This is not some kind of vague, wishy-washy philosophy. It is a principle, and one I hold inviolable.

My idea of open-mindedness doesn’t just apply to the obvious topics (racism, sexism, heterosexism, creedism, ableism, ageism, all the -isms.) It also has a lot to do with not really caring what people do with their free time. I’ve had friends tell me that video games are “stupid.” I’ve had customers at work say the same thing (while buying video games for a child or significant other.) I’ve heard arguments about all the “better” uses of one’s free time.

I’m sorry, what? It’s called free time for a reason. The only measure of whether something is a “good” use of it is whether or not you enjoy it.

There are a lot of things I don’t enjoy. Knitting, extreme sports, reality television… and you know what? I do something else with my free time (reading, writing, the aforementioned video games)… who is anyone to tell me my use of my free time is “better” or “worse” than anyone else’s? Who am I to make the same claim?

On numerous websites I frequent, I’ve seen people go out of their way to journal about how a particular fandom or style of art is “dumb” and then systematically delete any comment in which the commenter said, basically, “So what?” I’ve seen people post similarly negative comments on specific works of fan art and fan fiction. Seriously, if you don’t enjoy something, why go out of your way to attack it? There’s actually nothing better or worse about your own tastes. They’re just… your tastes. Find art or stories that you enjoy more. It’s not that hard. Why waste the effort? (Note: I’m not talking about reviews or critiques; that’s a completely different animal, with completely different aims.)

Being open-minded, in my opinion, has a lot to do with, pardon the colloquialism, just chilling the fuck out about what other people do when it doesn’t affect you.

So does being open-minded mean I have to not say anything when people campaign against legal recognition of same-sex relationships? That I have to say, “That’s a-okay!” when someone is being unbelievably racist and it’s making my skin crawl?

No. No, it really doesn’t. In fact, there is nothing contradictory about trying to get other people to treat others with respect and maturity, or at least leave them the hell alone if they can’t manage respect and maturity.

Welcome

My name is Katherine, but you should call me Kat. I’m a transwoman who was born in the Chicagoland area and recently moved to Rhode Island.

I’ve previously blogged on services like LiveJournal and Blogger, but I decided I’m ready to have my own Dot Com. We’ll see how this goes! I primarily blog about sports, politics, entertainment, and fandom.

My identity obviously gives me a strong connection to the queer community, so I will make frequent mention of queer issues. For those confused by the term, you may be more accustomed to the “alphabet soup” model (LGBT, LGBTQ, GLBT, LGBTQA, LGBTQI…), but I prefer the term queer because it doesn’t pick and choose which of the various queer identities we’re going to acknowledge, and doesn’t put them in any particular order.

As far as other sources of perceived bias, I am a socialist, and my political commentary will generally be from this perspective. As an American, this means I mostly (reluctantly) support the Democratic Party, but would rather see a more European-style Left emerge in this country, and will be enthusiastic about movement in that direction. My social views are largely informed by the tenants of radical-libertarian feminism. (No, this has nothing to do with the Libertarian Party, or libertarian economic ideas at all.)

I am a theist, but you are unlikely to see this impact my blogging in any meaningful way, unless for some reason I am writing about explicitly spiritual themes (which is unlikely, as I consider spirituality to be deeply personal in nature.) I think public life ought to be secular, as that is the most reasonable way to make everyone comfortable.

Since I will frequently blog about sports, I will own my biases: I strongly favor Chicago and Canadian (especially Toronto-based) teams. Nevertheless, over the years my appreciation for the game has led me to be able to competently examine these contests independent of my particular biases, appreciating the game itself and the many narratives involved much more than my personal rooting interest.

Finally, I am an unabashed “nerd,” so you will find that I frequently blog about various fandoms (superheroes, science fiction, etc.)

I sincerely hope that anyone who stumbles across this blog will find the experience a rewarding one. Thanks for reading.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers